
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 465 Days Ago by psychodudu -
- 15 comments

Photo © psychodudu (1 imagination for sale - *as new*) - www.25sept.com/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
zulu said 465 days ago:
ArneG said 465 days ago:
Your mission - should you choose to accept it..... :)
King said 465 days ago:
It's a lovely, well-done photograph that doesn't hold much interest for me beyond the photographic qualities, which are very fine.
eggplant said 465 days ago:
I like the nearly monochromatic nature and that all the elements are silhouetted, and the gradient background, so impact, comp, tech, and qual get high ratings, but for relevance I'm stuck in the middle...just not sure I'm begging to know what the story is with this one (but, still a great shot).
zorilla said 465 days ago:
The body language tells me this is the "It's not you. It's me" scene
Ana said 465 days ago:
this is beautiful. I love the silhouette.
guisboro said 465 days ago:
Love the simplicity of this shot. The colour of the sky works really well against the silhouettes of the two people.
psychodudu said 465 days ago:
Thanks for all the comments! Isn't this a great theme? I'm having an enormous amount of fun. I think I just missed out on a feature due to the low relevance vote. Ah well...he said through clenched teeth.
kadenajack said 464 days ago:
"So you wanna come back to my place?"
SeekingFocus said 463 days ago:
Sucka. Don't clench your teeth at me. I think I knocked you over the line.
King said 463 days ago:
Andrew...congratulations, oh impatient one!
This is how to get a featured image that has low average Relevance ratings yet top-notch Technique and Quality (which is okay, in my opinion).
There has been a large discussion on the WeeklyShot Google group over this situation, "The Relevance category: how relevant should this be?"
http://groups.google.com/group/weeklyshot/browse_frm/thread/cb98e130046a3b89?hl=en
psychodudu said 463 days ago:
Haha, just seen this! The rating for relevance here was 2.87, which on reflection is perhaps spot on, because that seems to be how peopple were divided just reading the comments. Personally, I think it to be woth way more than that, at least 3,75. How much info do you need, for goodness sake. Use YOUR imagination, if you don't take time to study the image you'll never see the details.
psychodudu said 463 days ago:
zorilla had the right reaction, I thought, and my storyline was something similar. I had imagined it thus; "I need some time, I'm going away - taken a job in NYC. I need time to deal with what you've done, you selfish s.o.b.". He's speechless because he never thought that she would ever find out about an affair he was having with a woman in Madrid, especially as they live in Oslo, Norway.....
Is that good enough, King? I read your little outburst on Brant's featured image of the African schoolboys. Did you have a bad day yesterday, or are you just getting up a head of steam...lol.
King said 463 days ago:
Brant told a great story, didn't he?
philippe said 461 days ago:
J'ai bien aimé cette photo quand je l'ai vue sur Vazaar. Le recadrage la rend encore plus forte. Bravo, Andrew!
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
Very nice! Great light and colors. The story is about the beauty of this image not in the center.