Response to Three (Response #64)

Uploaded 865 Days Ago by mooch - 13 comments

Photo © mooch (tobias "Maximus Decimus Meridius" reynolds) - www.moochuk.com
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

splendor-solis said 865 days ago:

Not sure how possible it would've been to capture this from a different angle, but I think that would've added something to it.

However, I really do like the detail and depth of field in this - Looks great.

mooch said 865 days ago:

I entitled this shot 'Photo Finish'.

No, I feel this angle of approach is suitable.

faustina said 865 days ago:

This one is my favorite between the two. I love how the slower snail is looking at the others!

flawijn said 865 days ago:

i love those snails! they're like racing side by side :-)

codedlanguage said 865 days ago:

Great color range.

tenebrophilia said 865 days ago:

I like this one even better!

gorin-images said 864 days ago:

I think I know which of these snails is going to lose the race (assuming that first image is from earlier on and the lower snail hasn't in fact "caught up")....

gorin-images said 864 days ago:

Having read the other comments, I have to add that I like this particular angle. But I also crave to see the head-on view of the approaching snails, shot from right on the deck!

splendor-solis said 864 days ago:

My comment doesn't say the angle isn't suitable :)

I really like the photo, but I still believe another angle *MAY* add something to the shot.

mooch said 864 days ago:

It is in keeping with the current featured image of the same subject. That of a race. Hence the choice of angle.

Lange said 864 days ago:

Nothing to say but.... perfection! Snails are not the easiest animals to photograph. If this does not become a featured image, I will be exceptionally surprised. The clairty and the composition are amazing!

phototext said 862 days ago:

Lovely shot.

mdunmore said 860 days ago:

Race is on! I really like this shot. The only think I might try differently is getting a greater depth of feild. Here is why I say that... I see the two in the background as "ahead" of the one that is in focus even though physically the one in foreground is closer. Giving a greater DOF I think would solve that.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.