Browse Responses
‹ Newer | Up | Older ›

Response to The End (Response #175)

Uploaded 598 Days Ago by JIMJIM - 21 comments

Photo © JIMJIM (Jean Marc Veliscek) - www.somedaysomewhere.net/Photoblog/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

psychodudu said 598 days ago:

I don't really know what to say for this one.

psychodudu said 598 days ago:

Alors, je ne sais pas quoi dire! Ca ne marche pas pour moi, Jean Marc.

Magician378 said 598 days ago:

The image seems very overexposed out to me. Was this intentional?

Magician378 said 598 days ago:

Man, I'm having typo after typo today - oops!

JIMJIM said 598 days ago:

Je comprend bien, no problemo ;-)
..c'est une tentative conceptuelle sur la fin tragique des poissons d'eau salée à l'age moderne (et parfois un peu barbarre...) et pour amener un peu de douceur j'ai simulé un tirage extra doux (effet fantôme...).

JIMJIM said 598 days ago:

@ Magician378 : YES, completly !! it's a bit conceptual, coz at least they will all disapear (as we all will...)
(and at least, I'm sure I will get comments on this one -oops! :)

Dave_Mac said 598 days ago:

This looks like it could potentially be a good shot, but I can't see any of the details! Was the near transparency of this shot intentional?

JIMJIM said 598 days ago:

@ Dave : Thanks for the comment...yes, as you can read (up) this is completly intentional - and yes this "was" a good shot (details and contrasts...) but I wanted to "ghostly"..!

Dave_Mac said 598 days ago:

I do like and respect your creativity JIMJIM and the fact that you take risks. Keep up the good work.

Aryk said 598 days ago:

the effect of the veil is very intense.

emich said 598 days ago:

Way too light :-/

headphoneland said 597 days ago:

This is very very flat & bright? Have you calibrated your monitor?

headphoneland said 597 days ago:

Ohright sorry!

JIMJIM said 597 days ago:

It's OK mate ! No problemo !! Thank you ;-)

Magician378 said 597 days ago:

At first, I thought they were just packed in ice... maybe a freezer perhaps.

bioLarzen said 597 days ago:

Well, do I miss something here? Relevance is OK, but what is this fog for?

JIMJIM said 597 days ago:

@ bioLarzen : well, thanks BioLarzen for your comment and I can explain it a bit more : the image is treated as a really high key because it gives the feelin of stepping out of a sheltered place into the sunlight - drained of colours, shadows and shapes - and to me, this represents the way for all creatures the things disapear and ends..so, yes,it's a kind of fog here !!

philippe said 597 days ago:

I just want to read the comments...

philippe said 597 days ago:

OK, je comprends l'intention, mais l'image est trop "délavée" pour moi aussi.

dcreighton said 597 days ago:

OK I'm sure there is a good reason for this being so light but I don't see it. Look forward to reading all the other comments.

dcreighton said 597 days ago:

JimJim, I understand what you were going for after reading your comments but I don't think this was the image to pull it off with as it doesn't translate well to me, the viewer. A ghostly figure, a heavenly (or going to heaven) type of image, etc would have been read completely differently then would dead fish which to me at least are read mentally as either dead fish or potential food on the table.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.