
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 623 Days Ago by uncommondepth - 12 comments

Photo © uncommondepth (Roberta Murray) - www.uncommondepth.com/pblog/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
ndemi said 623 days ago:
Ana said 623 days ago:
leap frog is a sin???
King said 623 days ago:
Lust? I think if we are talking about "sin," then animals, plants and inanimate objects are not highly relevant, but this is a good photo anyway...and funny, too.
Montage said 623 days ago:
Could be wrath, or lust, or envy. Nice one.
zorilla said 623 days ago:
Sin is an abstract concept that can only be perceived and understood through verbal communication.
Animals are not capable of sin.
uncommondepth said 622 days ago:
@ King and Zorilla: On the contrary. If you study animal behaviour of both wild and domesticated animals you will know that they are capable of jealousy (envy), rage (wrath), gluttony, and hording (greed).
How do explain a cow (horse, sheep, or other livestock) that breaks into a feed shed and eats so much it founders and dies? How do you explain a dog attacking its master, or another animal it had previously enjoyed the company of for no apparent reason? I could go on with many more examples.....
uncommondepth said 622 days ago:
Forgot to say I was going for lust and envy with this one. This is a fun theme, and thanks for the comments!
King said 622 days ago:
uncommondepth...you're certainly right about the behaviors and feelings, but sin is a concept (as zorilla explained) that relates specifically to human beings. No animals are punished in Dante's great work, "The Inferno."
So top marks for animal behaviors, low marks for sin.
But I still like your photo!
uncommondepth said 622 days ago:
So just because Dante says no animals shall be punished or be capable of sin, does this mean they can't be used to convey the concept? "Pick a sin and try to portray it in an image." If animals are guilty of lust and envy, can't we use them to portray it, or do we need 'knock you on the head' obvious, literal portrayals featuring only people?
Judging by the featured images already I would say that abstract concepts are also effective. I might also point out that the debate of whether animals can be punished for their sins or not is highly dependant on your culture and/or religion. However, onwards........
King said 622 days ago:
It's just opinions and I'm the last to say what's relevant and what's not on this theme.
I *still* like your photo.
kpaul said 622 days ago:
flamingo wrath
rocksunderwater said 622 days ago:
I wouldnt classify natue a sin, unless you get off on it, that might be some sort of sin.
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
Poor guy!