Browse Responses
‹ Newer | Up | Older ›

Response to Seeing Double (Response #13)

Uploaded 273 Days Ago by JIMJIM - 16 comments

Photo © JIMJIM (Jean Marc Veliscek) - www.somedaysomewhere.net/Photoblog/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

uvikidd said 273 days ago:

HIGH Mark From me ..
this awsom .. !!
Everything looks double .. yihaa

Ana said 273 days ago:

the tea bottles take a bit away from the coolness of this set up, but it's cool all the same.

zorilla said 273 days ago:

How many beers?

JIMJIM said 273 days ago:

mucho mucho :)

stolenlife said 273 days ago:

Just a clone, or multiple exposure?

JIMJIM said 273 days ago:

@stolenlife : no clone (not allowed..) nor a multiple exposure..just (as zorilla mentionned before) a few beers (after a few tequila..) and as I can remember panning the camera like clic clac bird ! that's havin'good fun with a "no film" camera :)

nattfodd said 273 days ago:

Now, that sure is relevant! The effect is pretty nice, but I don't feel that the original scene was that interesting in the first place.

How did you achieve this effect? Before or after shooting?

JIMJIM said 273 days ago:

@nattfodd : thanks, i agree - and the *Before* process was to drink (a bit!)

Montage said 273 days ago:

Although it's doing my eyes in a little bit, cool take on the theme.

Beamer said 273 days ago:

I looked at this a long time, trying to decide if this is a double exposure or PS. By looking closely at the shirt I believe that it is indeed a well executed double exposure, so high marks from me.

Dave_Mac said 273 days ago:

Interesting shot! I like it.

Ana said 272 days ago:

Looking at this again.... and besides the panning doubles, there's the reflection doubles. So great!

JIMJIM said 272 days ago:

Thank you ana :) and thank you ALL for the many feed-backs and support !
@stolenlife, nattfodd & Beamer : technically - again no post-processing here.. - more a kind of double exposure but not with 2 different images -- in fact using a long time exposure (1/6 sec.)and using the zoom (not panning indeed!!) to create the *double vision* :)) - if that makes sense !?
Take care :)

photografiado said 271 days ago:

It's cloned.

JIMJIM said 271 days ago:

@photografiado : no, it's not ! - Why ??

xose said 271 days ago:

Good shot, it's cloned? Anyway high relevance

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.