WeeklyShot

You are not logged in | Login

Browse Responses
‹ Newer | Up | Older ›

Response to Noise, noise, noise! (Response #71)

Uploaded 820 Days Ago by hicks0r - Featured Image - 11 comments


Photo © hicks0r (Enric) - www.ecomam.net
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

CaptureThis said 820 days ago:

I really like these kinds of images, and this one is simply beautiful.

jr66 said 820 days ago:

What a striking shot it has a very watercolor feel to it because of the depth of field, hard to find anything to criticise

TheShadeReplied said 820 days ago:

This is a beautiful image, well done. The high key whites are subtle, maybe too subtle in places, but the effect is outstanding.

emmat said 819 days ago:

stunning!

Lange said 819 days ago:

I love how the noise gives a "watercolor" feel to this image.

George said 819 days ago:

Has an ethereal dreamy quality to it. A whole storbybook in one image. So summery and fresh.

Relevance is below average for me, possibly because the white petals are largely noise free, which raises the question, how much visible noise will a relevant image demand? The suggestion in this case is not enough for noise to be one of the bigger features of the image.

That snippet of background on the right edge exerts subtle power. Some people have a lazy eye, I have a distracted one...and it keeps wandering over to that bit of background on the right....away from that marvelously delicious center.

In all...a delightful image with some subtle and small yet distinct distractions.

hicks0r said 818 days ago:

Thanks all for your comments and your opinion, I'm really happy with it, I think I'm gonna learn a lot here with that kind of comments

@george The white petals doen't have many noise becouse they where very overexposed, but u are Ok in your opinion of the suggestion, but I have the desire for put this photo up, and I'm happy all of you apreciate the noise that it have.

Soz for my english :)

panhandlin said 818 days ago:

Beautiful. Love this shot.

zinkwazi said 817 days ago:

hicks0r, you mention that you think you'll learn a lot at weeklyshot...
one of the most valuable things that you can learn is how to interact in an online community such as weeklyshot.
don't make the mistake in thinking that this is just some website.
no, this is a place for people to expose themselves by displaying art that, arguably, stems from the depths of their being.
not taking the time to understand the photo you're looking at and then commenting "WTF is this? Try harder next time" is unacceptable. (as you did on this image: http://www.weeklyshot.org/theme/noise-noise-noise/response/33/ )
if you need a role model when it comes to constructive comments, follow someone like miles from mute.rigent.com or david from chromasia.com around for a few days...

with much restraint.

greg from zinkwazi.com

hicks0r said 817 days ago:

I'm sorry in that commnet, but I was 12 hours this weekend taking photos on planes and helicopters, to much sun for my head.

I try harder next time.

derLITOGRAPH said 807 days ago:

I like the way the image was set in scene. You don't see the whole flower, but thats interesting.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.