Response to Negative Space (Response #23)

Uploaded 553 Days Ago by beckn32 - 7 comments

Photo © beckn32 (Kim Norton) - beckn32pics.my-expressions.com
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

groen65 said 553 days ago:

Great shot - marvellous colours and DoF. I would, however, have removed the bit in the left-hand bottom corner (behind the flower).

Ana said 553 days ago:

very pretty. like the half flower

kadenajack said 553 days ago:

I'm all over the place with this one. It's highly relevant. The bold colors help to make a good impact. Though I like the cropped approach, I think you cut off too much of the flower. It seems a little soft focus. This shot is so close to being 5's, but it's shortcomings bring it down a bit.

kadenajack said 553 days ago:

...and now I see it's from my photoblogging friend beckn32. Welcome aboard and don't take the comments too personally. I've learned a lot from getting ripped to shreds.

King said 553 days ago:

Nice flower. Appears to be in focus. Could use, IMHO, some judicious cropping. See my thread on Negative Space in the WS Google group.

luminouslens said 553 days ago:

This kind of looks like a sunrise. :)

However, I think if you had a bit more depth of field to the flower, it would be more eye catching. I also find the background flowers to be distracting.

beckn32 said 553 days ago:

Thanks very much everyone. I have a good feeling that I'm going to be learning tons from posting on WS. I really appreciate everyone's comments. @ kadenajack - I've been following WS for awhile now and realize that constructive cristicism is handed out much more than a regular photoblog. I'm open to it all.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.