
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 584 Days Ago by CraigMartin - 18 comments

Photo © CraigMartin (Craig Martin) - picasaweb.google.com/craigxmartin
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
CraigMartin said 584 days ago:
reality said 584 days ago:
buzzzzzzzzzz!
that is cool!
mooch said 584 days ago:
Good subject, good exposure
Judy said 584 days ago:
that's a good idea! :)
gembase said 584 days ago:
This is a great one? wich exposure time did you use ?
gembase said 584 days ago:
sorry for the "?" type mismatch should have been a "!"
CraigMartin said 584 days ago:
Thanks for all the comments. @gembase, this was taken at f.11 at 1/160.
feelingdave said 583 days ago:
very cool
Ana said 583 days ago:
trying to tell if this is a different light than the first one posted!
dcreighton said 583 days ago:
I'm left feeling like I've seen this one before... well almost.
philippe said 583 days ago:
Is this the same light bulb as before? Nice shot, BTW.
CraigMartin said 583 days ago:
I know, it sure looks exactly like the bulb Cferroni shot, much to my chagrin. I noticed this bulb while lying on a friend's couch, and started thinking it would make a cool macro shot for this week's theme. After shooting a few shots and seeing the result I got quite excited by the possibilities, thinking it would be really different and creative. I spent about half an hour mulling over the different angles I had shot, before settling on this one. And it is virtually the same as Cferroni's featured shot!
In retrospect, I figure I must have seen his shot, even if didn't register consciously when I was getting all excited about this bulb. Ah well. Next time I hope my creative epiphany will be really original.
Justly, this shot is scoring a little under feature range, reflecting the "its been done before" reaction.
dcreighton said 583 days ago:
CraigMartin- I thought about commenting on your current predicament after realizing you didn't do it intentionally but then I realized there wasn't anything I could say to help so I figured I'd let you suffer some more... LOL. Seriously I know where you are coming from. It's tough but photographically there is very little that hasn't been done before. Sucks for us huh?
BTW this was nicely done and I judge the image on the basis of this image only and ignored the fact that it was similar to the previous.
philippe said 583 days ago:
Craig, you've done a fine job, maybe better than the other one, it's difficult to say. The only problem is you come in second place.
Dan, you raise a good point. I think everything has been done before. We live in a conceptual post-modern world. The only question is: what makes my work a bit different than everything else? Just the idea. and the way we see things. Ask Blizzard.
mtmartini said 581 days ago:
I have to admit Craig that I didn't even get close to commenting on this shot because of my "its been done before" reaction and I had commented on the other bulb. I really like the composition of yours, it's too bad that it wasn't featured as it is definitely worthy.
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
Aghhh...I didn't see the one that got featured!! I hate it when people just go out and copy a featured shot, and here I have gone and done it! Apologies to Cferroni.