Browse Featured
‹ Newer | Up | Older ›

Featured in Looking Through (Response #131)

Featured 465 Days Ago by mooch - - 15 comments

Photo © mooch (tobias "Maximus Decimus Meridius" reynolds) - www.moochuk.com
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

SeekingFocus said 466 days ago:

I live this, though I can't help but want to get rid of those bushes on the bottom.

mooch said 466 days ago:

I left them in for context SF. Had I not I'd get "oh I can't tell what this is" blah blah blah

SeekingFocus said 466 days ago:

mooch,

Perhaps you're right, but that's exactly why I would like it more without. One can never please everyone!

mooch said 466 days ago:

It;s a famous quote, isn't it! ;)

JIMJIM said 466 days ago:

Nice effect and almost a perfect symetry !

Pixorperfect said 466 days ago:

Nice shot but I would have liked to see a bit of an angle to this one rather than straight on.

psychodudu said 466 days ago:

...but I don't see anything at the end...lol!
This is is a cracker. If it were me I'd be looking for more contrast, and I know it's reeeeally picky but the line high up in the 3rd window hole in, ruins the effect imho. I still give it a bucket full of points.

pete said 466 days ago:

just keeps going and going... great photo!!

EXP said 465 days ago:

Nice endless loop shot. I had a similar one that I took in Japan. Where is thsi one? I'd have tightened the levels a bit more, the bottom looks washed out.

bioLarzen said 465 days ago:

Coould not be more on-theme, right?

WTF are we looking at here, in this wonderful shot?

High marks.

bioLarzen said 465 days ago:

mooch,

congrats!

OK, you left the bushes in to avoid those WTF questions, and I got no problem with the busjes, but I still have no idea of what this is :)

mooch said 465 days ago:

Ok, well this is um, how do I explain. You know you have arches in a bridge? Well, these are arches within the arches, if that makes sense. So you get double our arches and this subsequent shot. I think there were about 14 main arches so yes, this does go on and... on... and on. I think I agree, I shot this bridge 3 times and the saturation is always off. I may well shoot it again and you know what I think would maybe make it. If i could get a few heads peaking through either side down the arches to give it a sense of depth. Could be cool. also, this is quite an old image so the processing ain't great. Thanks for the comments everyone. Nearly featured ;)

mooch said 465 days ago:

Oh, sorry, it is featured!

bioLarzen said 465 days ago:

I guess I got what it is.

And congrats!

emmat said 465 days ago:

conrats on being featured mooch - i wondered if you would enter this very shot when i saw the challenge on thursday! well deserved feature :)

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.