
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 260 Days Ago by CushmoK - 11 comments

Photo © CushmoK (CushmoK) - www.cushmok.info/foto/index.php
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
Ana said 260 days ago:
stolenlife said 260 days ago:
I think Id prefer this in colour, there's not really enough contrast and texture for this too work in b&w for me. Theres light and shadow, but I think this is a stretch for architecture
nattfodd said 260 days ago:
This lacks some contrast, I'm looking for some real black and can't find it. Also, I'm not sure if it's an illusion from the grass and the light, but it seems that there are some artefacts on the ground, like if it was badly tone-mapped HDR.
Beamer said 260 days ago:
Look out here it comes!!!...image is a bit flat in the tonal range. Man made structure, shadow, not a lot of light... Sounds stupid, since the light creates the shadow. I guess what I'm saying is not a lot of punch, not a lot of impact.
winetou said 260 days ago:
I think this is to sharp
flipthom said 260 days ago:
Awesome. Very unique take on the theme. I'm curious about the processing and I'm hoping there wasn't a fall involved with this shot.
Montage said 260 days ago:
Seems to be some weird processing going on here. And does a basketball hoop qualify as architecture? I'm not so sure.
Cool perspective, though.
pete said 259 days ago:
wierd processing.. what effect were you going for?? the shadow is great!!
ArneG said 259 days ago:
Interesting post processing technique - almost solarized/posterized. Kinda sureal
Lange said 258 days ago:
A beautiful composition. To me, it seems washed out as if it were heavily Photoshopped. I am wondering if the original was more "contrasty"? I think this image is beautiful as is, but it seems as if the range of light and dark were more extensive, it would have greater impact.
dallenogare said 258 days ago:
What a good shot.
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
This almost looks like a sketch? I'd love to hear how this was processed, or what camera was used!