
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 636 Days Ago by photografica -
- 11 comments

Photo © photografica (Geoff Powell) - photografica.com.au/blog/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
JIMJIM said 636 days ago:
photografica said 636 days ago:
How about a supervisor ghost and an apprentice ghost? LOL And if ghosts shed their mortal skin, shouldn't they also shed their clothes :)
King said 635 days ago:
My hunch is that most folks are going to like the version of this shot that was posted earlier, as I do. There was an emotional connection to the other shot that I don't feel here, although this is good work.
photografica said 635 days ago:
Yep, I think you are probably right King. I also think the other one is much more emotionally powerful. But choice is good ;)
Montage said 635 days ago:
5's across the board from me. I loved this image when I saw it on your site, and I was hoping it would turn up here.
zulu said 635 days ago:
hello. as I saw your the first featured pic, I went on your homepage and saw these. I asked oneself already why you that not also shows. I finds still better than first. I am shure that becomes also featured. the light that on the woman falls is ingeniously. which gives it more exciting than a erotic ghost?!
photografica said 635 days ago:
Hey King, I suppose it's normal that newcomers get their first two entries featured? ;)
It has to be downhill from here, but it's nice to start with a bang! I love the light in this shot. And the erotic ghost is my wife, so that's pretty cool as well. :)
King said 635 days ago:
@photografica...I like you, so I had a chat with the Executive Committee.
What an understanding and cooperative wife you have.
kyla said 635 days ago:
while i loved your first one this one does not do it for me
rosedaddy said 633 days ago:
you can always get my attention with a little nudity
zinkwazi said 632 days ago:
this is pretty freaky, nice work!
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
So that makes two nude ghosts and one that is nude but that we can't see it (i presume...)
;-)