Response to Broken (Response #88)

Uploaded 491 Days Ago by psychodudu - 14 comments

Photo © psychodudu (1 imagination for sale - *as new*) - www.25sept.com/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

SeekingFocus said 491 days ago:

Nice shot. Highly relevant, high marks. Image quality could be a bit better, but it doesn't bother me much.

ChriZ said 491 days ago:

Love it!
The composition works well, even though I would have liked to see more of the frame, especially on the top where you just give a hint on what it looks like.
The reflections are great too, I can't find you taking the picture anywhere, hiding? =)
High marks!

kadenajack said 491 days ago:

Very nice. High marks.

The color treatment makes this look just like a chocolate window. Maybe I'm just hungry for dessert.

simpfan742 said 491 days ago:

Seems to be a little pixelated to me. Nice toning and comp though.

Ana said 491 days ago:

this is beautiful.

inophoto said 491 days ago:

High marks. Very relevant and nicely composed.

mtmartini said 490 days ago:

Very nice shot, I like the reflection in the window.

King said 489 days ago:

I like this very much. This monitor at my office doesn't allow an evaluation of color and brightness, but this looks fine to me.

"Dirt is NOT bad quality"...indeed!

psychodudu said 489 days ago:

Great comments....no feature...sulking...

King said 489 days ago:

Okay, sulk for a bit, but come back knowing that this is a high-quality image irrespective of the ratings. Now this angers some folks who took the time to rate the image. I'm speaking not even so much from my opinion of the image, but of Andrew's opinion of the image.

We have to believe in ourselves, in our vision and view of the world. That's my point.

psychodudu said 489 days ago:

You groove, bigga boy. Always there with the pick-me-up. :-))))

psychodudu said 489 days ago:

Here's the ratings:
Relevance: 4.14
Impact: 3.57
Composition: 3.36
Technique: 3.36
Quality: 3.21
Overall: 3.528 - I think I may have been the victim of some speedrating, as dicussed on your image King.
Some good points raised in that discussion, actually.

King said 489 days ago:

Andrew,

Not bad, really. You just missed a feature on this.

JIMJIM said 489 days ago:

and it's old too !!!
No ??
;-)))

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.