Response to Bridges (Response #114)

Uploaded 558 Days Ago by drazin - 7 comments

Photo © drazin (Matthew Drazin) - www.dontlinkhere.com
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

King said 558 days ago:

This image looks like it was scanned from old film...or an old print made from a negative. I like the stark composition, much like the stark day on which this was taken. Is the poor image quality intentional? or just an artifact of the original?

drazin said 558 days ago:

its from a scan from 120 film shot with a Yashica-D TRL camera. its film.

King said 558 days ago:

...and scanned on your flatbed scanner? I mention this because I have a huge archive of 120 transparencies and negatives, so I'm in the market for a quality 120 scanner. It's just money, after all.

drazin said 558 days ago:

i had it done wheni got the film developed. i was not super happy with the quality, but it give it the oldtime feel i wanted.

King said 558 days ago:

drazin,
Yes, I can see some of the same artifacts I saw when I had some color negative film scanned after being processed at a local lab...not a professional lab. I think they don't use the best scanners.

Ana said 558 days ago:

this looks like an old photo/scan. is it? great looking bridge.

inophoto said 558 days ago:

The lampost kills what otherwise might be an okay shot and it's wonky. My pet hate.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.