Browse Responses
‹ Newer | Up | Older ›

Response to Automobiles (Response #135)

Uploaded 869 Days Ago by Daaave - - 12 comments

Photo © Daaave (David Wray) - www.onequartermagic.co.uk
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

ArneG said 869 days ago:

Wow - that makes me dizzy - excellent - I would have given an 8 on technque if I could have.

agi said 868 days ago:

Very nice. This can be an ad for the auto manufacturer...it's that good.

lbimaging said 868 days ago:

Great motion shot but looks a bit dangerous. :-) High marks all around.

CaptureThis said 868 days ago:

Excellent. I can really feel the speed.

matto said 868 days ago:

everything is great here exept the blown highlights. in a pic so well thousht out and creatively composed, it feels like blown hghlights should not be happening.

it's a really great and effective off-kilter comp.

matto said 867 days ago:

i take it back about the highlights. this is great, period :)

Miles said 867 days ago:

Rocking.

gpinto said 867 days ago:

Perfect score! 5*5

George said 866 days ago:

ooo yeah baby.

waitammint. background's got that blurry motion look but not the reflection in the door. whazzup-p-ppp???

ocean said 866 days ago:

David... I love this - excellent shot! How did you set it up?

laurentb303 said 865 days ago:

Really nicely done.

Daaave said 864 days ago:

Thanks folks! I just got back from a photo job and find I've been lucky eough to be featured.

Matto: I know what you mean about the highlights, I like the background being a bit blown, but would have preferred the wheel to be a bit better.

George: I think it's because the reflection in the door only changed a little over the angle of movement, whereas the background moved loads.

Ocean: I set this up with a suction mount on the car door, then just rolled the car forward slowly. It may look like it's moving fast, but the exposure time was 1.2 sec; so it's easy to get a lot of blur.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.