
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 250 Days Ago by Beamer - 26 comments

Photo © Beamer (Clyde Beamer) - blog.clydebeamer.com
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
Ana said 250 days ago:
Ana said 250 days ago:
*waits for comment from Beamer...*
:)
flipthom said 250 days ago:
Hmm...I wonder who this belongs to?
Ana said 250 days ago:
well, I've commented on 28 of your 37.
:)
JimiThing said 250 days ago:
huh?
stolenlife said 250 days ago:
A pointed comment?
JIMJIM said 250 days ago:
second degree !
ArneG said 250 days ago:
haha - cute and yet relevant
zorilla said 250 days ago:
The distinct absence of photography should have meritted a high mark for relevance, but it didn't
Beamer said 250 days ago:
@zorilla: This is nothing but photography, multiple shots taken at my desk and collage in PS.
Beamer said 250 days ago:
@zorilla: This is nothing but photography, multiple shots taken at my desk and collage in PS.
pete said 250 days ago:
here is a comment for ya!
poor old Beamer... it does get frustrating i know
Beamer said 250 days ago:
Don't cry for me Argentina!!
I did decide to make a statement this morning on the Absence of comments recently on WS.
I shot this, edited this in PS, speed rated 13 images and posted this, all in @10 minutes.
As I said in a earlier post to the last Theme, I HAD been trying to rate and comment on every submission for that week. I probably was running at @90%+, but this week, well...Bah, Humbug!!
Cheers!!
mtmartini said 250 days ago:
An absence of comments - quite frankly this argument and complaint is very old. One comment from the right person, be that someone who's own work you admire or someones opinion that you value, is worth so much more than 12 useless 'nice shot' comments. Constructive criticism is usually not received that well by people who just want comments, or they prefer argue points to death rather than learning from what someone else has to say... I have been refraining from posting in this theme, instead I have been looking, rating and commenting solely as an exercise and to see if it really is worth while continuing to participate here. I just don't know.
Sorry for the rant on your image but comments really aren't worth that much if they always the same and not thought out.
mtmartini said 250 days ago:
oh well I had to be a shit disturber and post in the end. :-)
stolenlife said 249 days ago:
I always love comment discussions - theres one on the group at the mo, well worth joining in as always. I can be quite hardline on comments - I like them, and see it as an integral part of playing here every week. mtmartini is right in one way at least - if all the comment is going to say is 'cool' then it may as well not be said. On the other hand, my understanding is that comments are there to explain your rating.
Its a shame when people are unable to take constructive criticism, or even others opinions, day to day life must be very difficult for these people. Its important to remember this is just a GAME. Its not the _winning_ - its the taking part
</soapbox>
Anyway get over to the group and help to decide the next phase of weeklyshot. Do you want less rating before posting.
And sorry Beamer for monstering your post....
Ana said 249 days ago:
Leaving a comment that says, "I really like this" or "nice shot" is very meaningful. It might not be helpful, but it accomplishes two things.
1, it tells the photographer who is rating their shot, and 2, it tells the photographer that the person rating their shot is a participant, not just someone that rates, posts and waits.
Beamer said 249 days ago:
What stolenlife said is important and one of the reasons I did this. I agree, go to the google group discussion and chime in there, I'm sure Brandon will appreciate it. He has asked for us to answer a little survey about WS:
http://groups.google.com/group/weeklyshot/browse_thread/thread/28551fab1ac0131a#
I hope everyone has a great Christmas/New Years season. Try to get some love and some rest... If you can't find either, at least eat good and tip a glass to the New Year!!
CraigMartin said 249 days ago:
Funny... but is it absence of stars, absence of comments, or both that this is getting at?
mtmartini said 249 days ago:
@ stolenlife - Beamer likes the attention. ;-)))
Hummingbird said 249 days ago:
Interesting take. I thought this was going to be Ana.
kadenajack said 247 days ago:
I don't get it.
kadenajack said 247 days ago:
I still don't get it. I count a total of 14 comments in the image.
Beamer said 247 days ago:
The idea that you get anywhere from 13 - 17 people rating your image so they can post their own images, but on 2 or 3 take the time to comment is frustrating to some of us. I both value the comments(longer that 3 words, i.e. well thought out and meaningful), and I value commenting. I feel I learn from both. Lots of other opinions expressed above, most of which I respect.
phototext said 245 days ago:
Beard said 244 days ago:
Kind of a neat idea. But Beamer has been around I think.
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
well...aside from you kinda cheating and showing your name.....
this is perfect.