Browse Responses
‹ Newer | Up | Older ›

Response to Texture (Response #17)

Uploaded 330 Days Ago by ballpeen - - 9 comments

Photo © ballpeen (Mick LeTourneaux) - www.ballpeenbindery.com/bpb-pb/
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.

User Comments

Ana said 330 days ago:

one half texture. :)
Less of the spine would have had more 'texture' impact. but totally great all the same.

flipthom said 330 days ago:

What a great idea for this theme and very well executed. I love it.

pursang said 330 days ago:

Really well done. The contrast between the smoothness of the cover and the book's pages is striking. High marks.

Beamer said 330 days ago:

The texture and the interest is there, it's just not the focus of the composition, and therefore, is secondary.

DrDavidJones said 330 days ago:

Nice, great angle.

Aryk said 330 days ago:

great idea, I use a paper macro!!

CaptureThis said 330 days ago:

I like this. It is nicely lit and has some variety of textures. I think I would have tried to include the entire spine of the book.

It's interesting because while the spine and covers look new the pages look very old.

Tedi17 said 330 days ago:

i really like this shot

ballpeen said 330 days ago:

Well, you're right Laurie, the manuscript is from 1617, while the binding is new: alum-tawed pigskin spine piece with vellum boards.

You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.