
You are not logged in | Login
Uploaded 447 Days Ago by George - 18 comments

Photo © George - www.jargonhunter.com/images/daily
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
CraigMartin said 447 days ago:
varner said 447 days ago:
In this day and age (or any "age" for that matter), I find this disturbing. But, I suppose, this was the effect that was hoped for?
mysight said 447 days ago:
This may be shocking for the younger crowd,
but I grew up playing'army'
and 'cops and robbers'.
We didn't have a game called "thug"
back then.
ooenzoo said 447 days ago:
good pic.
would have found it moor ineresting if the focus were an the gun
pursang said 447 days ago:
This one will get comments for sure. Thankfully, it's a toy gun!
Ana said 447 days ago:
ah, and we see it again! love those eyes!
Hummingbird said 447 days ago:
I give this a five for impact for sure, and has many other good elements. However, it bothers me, maybe because my father was a deputy and was taught never to point any kind of gun at anyone so seeing a child do that disturbs me.
Hummingbird said 447 days ago:
@my sight, apparently the no pointing guns rule was only aimed at me big brother.
Hummingbird said 446 days ago:
George, this is a good image and I probably should have kept my gun pointing opinions to myself. Although after seeing my brother's comments and asking my mother about why I had the gun rule, I found it I couldn't point any kind except a squirt gun at anyone because my dad carried a real gun for work and they were afraid that somehow I might get my hands on that. When my brother was younger my father wasn't a deputy and we didn't have a gun around all the time.
kadenajack said 446 days ago:
Stick 'em up! I wish the gun was in better focus, but the kid's eyes are great.
lbimaging said 446 days ago:
I still like it, but you are brave to resubmit it! :-)
George said 446 days ago:
@CraigMartin:
As you noted, this was a controversial image the first time I posted it. But I think the discussion it can prompt is an important one. While some may think this glamorizes guns or downplays guns, to me it speaks to an obvious problem in America. As for the focus, to me this wouldn't have the same impact if the gun was in focus but the kid's face was not, or if both were in focus. The object (gun) is clear enough to know what it is, but by being out of focus you immediately jump to the kid's intense look, almost as if you're not only looking down the barrel of his gun but also down the barrel of his eye...and because his face is largely obscured by the gun there's a further suggestion of looking down the barrel of all children's eyes. At least that's what it says to me. Thanks for your thoughtful comment.
@varner:
I couldn't agree more: it is disturbing, and yes, that's what I'm going for. I appreciate your comment.
@mysight:
I haven't heard of a game called "thug." What's that? I grew up playing the same games but have no particular love of guns today.
@ooenzo:
Thanks for your comment. As I mentioned in my reply to CraigMartin, the focus as it is I find more effective, but I see what you mean.
@pursang:
Mark, so far it's been relatively tame as compared to the first time I posted this image. Care to join in the debate?
@Ana:
Yup the eye clinches it :-)
@Hummingbird:
I have no problem whatsoever with you stating your opinions. One reason I posted the shot was to spark a conversation, and to get people to think about it. I understand your reaction, and I think it's perfectly normal for people to be bothered by this image. It bothers me. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be shared, not that I think that's what you're suggesting. I appreciate your thoughtful input and sharing of the story how guns relate to your life.
@kadenjack:
You're the third person to comment on the focus, so clearly that's an "issue". I still feel it's more effective this way. Thanks for your comment.
@lbimaging:
Glad you still like it.
mysight said 446 days ago:
George,I made up 'thug',
I think in playing 'cops and robbers' today
some kids look up to the "robbers"
and not the cops.
George said 446 days ago:
@mysight:
Ok, I see what you meant. Yeah, the thug mentality has been overly glamorized. It sells a lot of CDs.
Lange said 445 days ago:
Provacative and disturbing... of course... it is meant to be. But regardless, I do not see this image as overly relevant to the "toy" theme except perhaps in the socio-political sense.... because the gun shown does not look toy-like, but looks real. Photographically well done, however.
George said 445 days ago:
@Lange:
Not that I want you to work for it, but notice the six bullet chamber is closed. I'm no gun aficionado however I'm fairly certain in a real gun of this type there would be holes where the bullets go. So to me it's clearly a toy although the fact that it appears to be a real gun is THE point. There are more examples that beg the same question, where does "fantasy" end and "reality" begin? To my mind there is a level of responsibility at stake in making choices. That's what this image is fundamentally trying to speak to.
KAD_Imaging said 444 days ago:
Disturbing.... :(
zorilla said 441 days ago:
Dedicated to the students of West Virgina Tech?
I can't even calculate how tacky, offensive and inappropriate this image is.
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
Oh boy...I can already see the debate that this is going to create. In fact, I think this shot already created a stir the first time it got posted.
My bias - this exactly depicts one of the problems with American society today. So, disturbing, yes; relevant, definitiely; impact, huge.
On the technical side, since the theme is focused on toys, I would have liked the gun to be more in focus.